Well-being Index (AMR) for Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47187/mktdescubre.4.E.E..70Keywords:
Welfare, Indicators, Ecuador, Public Policy, Social EconomyAbstract
Ecuador faces persistent challenges in achieving effective integration into international financial and trade systems, as well as in advancing social inclusion. This situation is largely due to the limited availability of reliable information and the absence of public policies grounded in scientific research. The lack of comprehensive indicators that accurately reflect the country’s socioeconomic reality has hindered evidence-based decision-making aimed at sustainable development.
In this context, the development of a welfare index is proposed to assess the internal conditions of the Ecuadorian population, combining macroeconomic indicators with measures of citizen satisfaction. This tool seeks to provide a more accurate and multidimensional perspective of national development, supporting the design of public policies that foster equitable and inclusive growth. The proposed index, base don a multidimensional framework, aims to serve as a technical reference for policymakers and as a practical instrument for monitoring Ecuador’s progress toward greater social cohesion and international competitiveness.
References
1. Partanen, The Nordic Theory of Everything: In Search of a Better Life, New York, NY: HarperCollins, 2016.
2. Giddens, The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1998.
3. UNDP, “Human Development Report 2023: Breaking the Gridlock,” New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme, 2023.
4. OECD, “Inclusive Growth Framework,” OECD Publishing, Paris, 2022.
5. ECLAC, Multidimensional Poverty Measurement in Latin America, Santiago, Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), 2022.
6. D. Coyle, The Economics of Enough: How to Run the Economy as if the Future Matters, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.
7. R. Andrade Merino and M. Andrade Romero, “Proposal for the Selection of Experts,” European Chemical Bulletin, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 512–525, 2023.
8. M. Alvaréz, “El Método Delphi,” REIRE, Barcelona, 2016.
9. N. Dalkey and O. Helmer, “An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts,” RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 1963.
10. J. E. Stiglitz, People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent, New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, 2019.
11. ECLAC, “Social Panorama of Latin America 2023,” Santiago, Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), 2024.
12. IMF, “Global Financial Stability Report: Navigating Challenges,” Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, April 2024.
13. World Bank, “World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains,” Washington, DC: World Bank, 2020.
14. INEC, “Poverty Bulletin 2024: Technical Bulletin on Poverty and Inequality (January 2025),” Quito, Ecuador: INEC, 2025.
15. INEC, “Technical Bulletin: National Employment and Underemployment Survey,” Quito, Ecuador: INEC, 2025.
16. INEC, “Statistical Bulletin No. 01-2023-REESI: International Entry and Exit Registry 2024,” Quito, Ecuador: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INEC), 2025.
17. Ministry of Public Health, “Ten-Year Health Plan 2022–2031,” Quito, Ecuador: Ministerio de Salud Pública (MSP), 2022.
18. World Bank, World Development Indicators 2023, Washington, DC: World Bank, 2023.
19. SEMPLADES, National Development Plan 2021–2025, Quito, Ecuador: Secretariat of Planning and Development (SEMPLADES), 2024.
20. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Rev. ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
21. Sen, Development as Freedom, New York, NY: Anchor Books, 1999.
22. M. Andrade Romero and R. Andrade Merino, “Fintech: An Option for Financial Inclusion in Ecuador,” Digital Publisher CEIT, 2024.
23. J. D. Sachs, The Age of Sustainable Development, New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2015.
24. R. B. Reich, Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few, New York, NY: Knopf, 2015.
25. R. Wilkinson and K. Pickett, The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger, New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press, 2010.
26. E. Sen, Development as Freedom, Oxford University Press, 1999.
27. Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), Institutions for People: Toward a State at the Service of Citizens in Latin America and the Caribbean, Inter-American Development Bank, 2018.
28. J. Prast, Institutional Strengthening and Democratic Governance, Latin American Center for Development Administration (CLAD), 2016.
29. World Health Organization (WHO), World Health Report: Improving Performance, World Health Organization, 2020.
30. M. Cecchini et al., Conditional Cash Transfers and Social Protection Policies in Latin America, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), 2015.
31. World Bank, The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial Inclusion, Digital Payments, and Resilience in the Age of COVID-19, 2022.
32. Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2024, Berlin, 2024.
33. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Rule of Law and Access to Justice, UNDP, 2021.
34. D. Rondinelli, Decentralization and Development: Policy Implementation in Developing Countries, Sage Publications, 1983.
35. J. Stiglitz, A. Sen, and J. P. Fitoussi, Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris, 2009.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mauro Andrade Romero, Felipe Andrade Montalvo, Raúl Andrade Merino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
